| |
Achieving
a high beta value of 4.1% at the Large Helical Device (LHD)
-- Overview
of the 7th cycle plasma experiment -- |
| |
National
Institute for Fusion Science |
| |
Director-General
Dr. Osamu MOTOJIMA |
| LHD
beta value achieved to 4.1% (renewed the world record) |
 |
We
raised the electric power for a neutral particle beam injector to
heat plasmas up to maximum 13,000 kW. By adjusting its heating distribution,
a high beta value of 4.1% was drawn forth.
As a value achieved by a helical confinement system, our LHD value (4.1%)
replaced the past world record (3.4% achieved with a German device -- W7-AS
-- owned by the Max-Planck-Institute of Plasma Physics).
A beta value represents a ratio between the pressure of plasmas and that
of magnetic field used to confine the plasmas. We conduct various LHD researches
to achieve as high a beta value as possible. In the future nuclear fusion
reactors, a beta value of 5% or higher is expected for economic reasons.
NIFS will
attempt to bring out a much higher value by intensifying the electric power
for heating and adjusting the magnetic field for confinement.
When we achieved the beta value for 4.1%, the plasma core temperature was
around 5,300,000 degC, the density 28 trillions/cc, and the magnetic field
strength was 0.45 tesla. This beta value was computed using the average
pressures of plasmas and magnetic field within the area where the 99% of
plasma energy is present. Also, the plasma energy was measured from the
magnetic field. Please refer to the diagram one and
the diagram two for the detail.  |
| NIFS
also renewed a world record on the amount of data to be collected
in one plasma generation cycle. |
 |
In
the NIFS LHD experiment on January 22, the data collected in one
plasma generation cycle amounted to over 3.4 billion bytes. NIFS
overrode a previous record of 1.6billion bytes collected by JET. |
| Lots
of major plasma parameter records were renewed as well. |
 |
Besides the
plasma pressure experiment, we also renewed world records
on many of major plasma parameters that were used in LHD researches
this year. Please refer to the diagram one for
the detail. |
 |
- Plasma
ion temperature achieved to 113 million degC (electron
temperature 52 million degC, density 3.5 trillion/cc) with the
use of argon
gas.
- In the future,
we will attempt to achieve our original goal that is to
simultaneously heat ions and electrons up to 100 million
degC or higher with the use of hydrogen plasmas that have
a density of 20trillions or more/cc.
- Electric
discharge duration achieved to 756 sec (heating power 72kW, temperature
2.8 million degC, density 240 billions/cc).
- As for a long-term
discharge, we will attempt to maintain the electric discharge
for about 1000sec with 1000kW heating power; that is, our
challenge is to generate plasmas of total 1billion J while
heating input energy is maintaining the discharge.
- Stored
energy accumulated to 1.3 million J and electrons density
achieved to 220 trillions/cc.
- We will keep
challenging to renew those records even more and also will
try to resolve some physical challenges such as what determines
the maximum value for density.

|
| [Description]
Large Helical Device (LHD) |
| |
With the LHD,
we can build the magnetic field configuration that is necessary
to confine plasmas with external coils only. Therefore, in comparison
with ITER that depends on the current run through plasmas or Tokamak
type devices such as JT60, the LHD has a superior controllability.
The LHD is told more appropriate a device for the steady operation, the
quality
that is strongly expected for future electric power generation reactors.
Also in terms of magnetic field structures, the LHD fundamentally
differs from Tokamak type devices. Therefore, by conducting complementary
researches with the latter type devices, it is expected to become
a supporting device in proceeding the ITER project.
The LHD experiment
in the fiscal year 2003 (Apr.2003 thr Mar.2004) was started from
Sep.24, 2003 and completed on Jan.22, 2004. During the experiment,
we discharged plasmas for 7510 times.
Especially, we
succeeded in efficiently confining the high-pressure
plasmas this year. In order to
generate plasmas that are more suitable for nuclear fusion,
we will
continuously attempt to intensify the electric power for heating.
Also, we would like to establish the plasma control method
on the basis of those previous results.
Diagram
Three shows a record of major LHD plasma parameter developments
for the past 6 years since the start of the first experiment.
It indicates that the LHD experiments have been carried out prosperously. |
|
|
|
Diagram
One: It indicates the progress of beta values produced with helical
type experiment devices.
|
|

Diagram Two:
High-temperature, high-density plasmas possess high-pressure. Due
to this pressure, those plasmas are known to cause instability
so that they could escape across the magnetic field. |
 |
|
*In the LHD,
some people were apprehensive about this instability that once the
beta value exceeds 3% or more, the instability may restrict any further
elevation of the value.
A result from the current experiment indicates
that the instability in question did not happen and that the LHD
could produce a high beta value. This also means that the biggest
issue regarding the achievement of a high beta value was possibly
resolved.
Diagram Two: Cont.
Diagram Two shows a typical
waveform of a plasma discharge. At around the beta value of 3% or over,
slight fluctuation in a magnetic field, a mode called m=1/n=1, becomes
visible on the plasma surface. This fluctuation is what was concerned
the most. Even though the fluctuation appears sometimes intermittently
after one second, they eventually become restricted, and the beta value
will achieve to 4%. The m=2/n=3 mode is observed further out of plasmas
than
m=1/n=1
mode; yet, there are not much influence to the plasma confinement. Also,
m=2/n=1 mode that was observed within a lower beta area (2.5% or lower),
located nearby the plasma core, has been stabilized. This experiment
result shows the possibility of a presence of those machineries to stop
the instability and calls for the necessity to come up with a new theoretical
speculation. Moreover, it may also result in prompting researchers to
review the current LHD beta value that has been considered at its upper
limit. This draws a bright curtain for future nuclear fusion reactors.
NIFS will attempt
to construct a physical model with a high predictive accuracy.
|
|
 |
| |
Diagram Three:
Development of temperature and discharge duration. This is a major
record regarding the LHD plasma confinement performance. NIFS performed
7 experiments for the past 6 years. Only for the first year, we conducted
2 short-term experiments. Thence, we've had a 4 to 5-month-cycle
experiment once a year. |
|
| |
2002 |
2003 |
| Beta
value |
3.2%
magnetic field
0.5T
temperature
4.4 million degC
density
29 trillions/cc |
4.1%
magnetic field
0.45T
temperature
5.3 million degC
density
28 trillions/cc |
| Electron
temperature |
120 million
degC
Ion
temperature 23 million degC
density
5 trillions/cc |
Same as
Left |
| Ion
temperature |
80 million
degC
Electron
temperature 46 million degC
density
3 trillions/cc |
13 million
degC
Electron
temperature 52 million degC
density
3.5 trillions/cc |
| Density |
160 trillions/cc
temperature
46 million degC |
220 trillions/cc
temperature
40 million degC |
| Accumulated
energy |
1.16
million J
temperature
12 million degC
density
96 trillions/cc |
1.3 million
J
temperature
15 million degC
density
103 trillions/cc |
| Discharge
duration |
150 sec
temperature
26 million degC
density
5 trillions/cc
heating
power 500kW |
756 sec
temperature
2.8 million degC
density
240 billions/cc
heating
power 72kW |
|
| |
Table 1:
Comparison of the records between the year 2002 and 2003 |